Internal SSD
Netac 960GB N535S SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, 3D TLC NAND, R/W 560/520 MB/s, 7mm
Samsung 1TB 870 EVO SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, V-NAND, R/W, 560/530 MB/s, 98K/88K IOPS, 7mm
Samsung 1TB 970 EVO PLUS M.2 NVMe SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe, V-NAND, R/W 3500/3300 MB/s, 600K/550K IOPS
Samsung 1TB 990 PRO M.2 NVMe Gen4 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe 4.0, V-NAND, R/W 7450/6900 MB/s, 1200K/1550K IOPS
Samsung 250GB 870 EVO SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, V-NAND, R/W, 560/530 MB/s, 98K/88K IOPS, 7mm
Samsung 2TB 870 EVO SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, V-NAND, R/W, 560/530 MB/s, 98K/88K IOPS, 7mm
Samsung 2TB 990 PRO M.2 NVMe SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe 4.0, V-NAND, R/W 7450/6900 MB/s, 1400K/1550K IOPS
Samsung 4TB 870 EVO SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, V-NAND, R/W, 560/530 MB/s, 98K/88K IOPS, 7mm
Samsung 4TB 990 PRO M.2 NVMe SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe 4.0, V-NAND, R/W 7450/6900 MB/s, 1600K/1550K IOPS
Samsung 500GB 870 EVO SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, V-NAND, R/W, 560/530 MB/s, 98K/88K IOPS, 7mm
Team 1TB MP33 M.2 NVMe Gen3 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe3, R/W 1800/1500 MB/s
Team 1TB MP44 M.2 NVMe Gen4 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe4, R/W 7400/6500 MB/s, Heat Dissipating Graphene Label
Team 1TB MP44L M.2 NVMe Gen4 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe4, R/W 5000/4500 MB/s, Heat Dissipating Graphene Label
Team 256GB CX2 SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, SLC Caching, R/W 520/430 MB/s, 7mm
Team 256GB MP33 M.2 NVMe Gen3 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe3, R/W 1600/1000 MB/s
Team 256GB MS30 M.2 SATA SSD, M.2 2280, SATA3, R/W 500/400 MB/s
Team 2TB MP44 M.2 NVMe Gen4 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe4, R/W 7400/7000 MB/s, Heat Dissipating Graphene Label
Team 2TB MP44L M.2 NVMe Gen4 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe4, R/W 4800/4400 MB/s, Heat Dissipating Graphene Label
Team 2TB MS30 M.2 SATA SSD, M.2 2280, SATA3, R/W 550/500 MB/s
Team 2TB QX SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, 3D QLC NAND, R/W 560/500 MB/s, 7mm
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.