Internal SSD
Brand
ADATAADATA 23
CORSAIRCORSAIR 8
- KINGSTON 18
- NETAC 13
SamsungSamsung 9
- TEAM 17
- WD 13
“ADATA 2TB Legend 710 NVMe SSD – PCIe 3.0, 2400/1800MB/s, M.2 2280” has been added to your cart. View cart
ADATA 1TB Legend 710 M.2 NVMe SSD, Gen3, PCIe 3.0, 2280, 3D NAND, 2400/1800 MB/s
ADATA 1TB Legend 800 M.2 NVMe SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe Gen4, 3D NAND, R/W 3500/2200 MB/s
ADATA 1TB Legend 860 M.2 NVMe Gen4 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe4, R/W 6000/4000 MB/s, PS5 Compatible
ADATA 1TB Ultimate SU800 SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, 7mm (Spacer), 3D NAND, 560/520 MB/s
ADATA 1TB XPG GAMMIX S70 Blade M.2 NVMe SSD, PCIe 4.0, 7400/5500 MB/s, 740K IOPS
ADATA 1TB XPG SX8200 PRO M.2 NVMe SSD, PCIe, 3500/3000 MB/s, 390K/380K IOPS, Heatsink Included
ADATA 240GB Ultimate SU630 SSD – 2.5″ SATA3, 520/450MB/s R/W, 3D QLC NAND, 65K IOPS
ADATA 256GB Legend 710 M.2 NVMe SSD – PCIe 3.0, 2100/1000MB/s, 3D NAND
ADATA 256GB SU650 M.2 SATA SSD – 550/500MB/s, 3D NAND, 80K/60K IOPS
ADATA 256GB SU800 SSD – 2.5″ SATA3, 560/520MB/s, 3D NAND (7mm w/Spacer)
ADATA 2TB Legend 710 NVMe SSD – PCIe 3.0, 2400/1800MB/s, M.2 2280
ADATA 2TB Legend 800 M.2 NVMe SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe Gen4, 3D NAND, R/W 3500/2800 MB/s
ADATA 2TB Legend 860 NVMe SSD – PCIe Gen4, 6000/5000MB/s, PS5 Compatible
ADATA 2TB XPG GAMMIX S70 Blade NVMe SSD – PCIe 4.0, 7400/6700MB/s, 750K IOPS
ADATA 500GB Legend 800 M.2 NVMe SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe Gen4, 3D NAND, R/W 3500/2200 MB/s
ADATA 500GB Legend 860 M.2 NVMe Gen4 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe4, R/W 5000/3000 MB/s, PS5 Compatible
ADATA 512GB Legend 710 M.2 NVMe Gen3 SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe 3.0, 3D NAND, R/W 2400/1600 MB/s
ADATA 512GB XPG GAMMIX S70 Blade M.2 NVMe SSD, M.2 2280, PCIe 4.0, 3D NAND, R/W 7400/2600 MB/s, 425K/510K IOPS
ADATA 960GB Ultimate SU630 SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, 7mm , QLC 3D NAND, R/W 520/450 MB/s, 65K IOPS
ADATA SU630 480GB SSD, 2.5″, SATA3, 520/450MB/s
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.